The Sentiment Argument for Artificial Feeding of the Dying

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The sentiment argument emphasizes the unique symbolic significance of nourishment and associated deep seated emotions. The argument distinguishes between medical treatments which may be discontinued when there is little or no hope of recovery, and artificial feeding which should not be. To withhold basic sustenance is to starve someone to death. The article describes the probable origins of our feelings about food and drink and shows how they are rooted in our every day world of experience. It is argued that such feelings cannot be transfered without distortion to the hospital world. Rather, authentic sentiment seems to demand discontinuance of artificial feeding of the dying person.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: