Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Menopause
- Vol. 11 (3) , 264-274
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gme.0000094210.15096.fd
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of, and factors associated with, the accuracy of self-report (participant-report and proxy-report) for fractures. Study participants were from the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational Study cohorts. All women were postmenopausal; populations included American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander, black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white. The average length of follow-up was 4.3 years. Self-reported fractures were adjudicated by reviewing medical records. The first adjudicated self-report of fractures for each participant was included in the analysis (n = 6,652). We found substantial variations in validity of self-report by the fracture site. Agreements between self-reports for single-site fractures and medical records were high for hip (78%) and forearm/wrist (81%) but relatively lower for clinical spine fractures (51%). The average confirmation rate for all single-site fractures was 71%. Misidentification of fracture sites by participants or proxy-reporters seemed to be a cause of unconfirmed self-reports. Higher confirmation rates were observed in participant-reports than in proxy-reports. Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that multiple factors, such as ethnicity, a history of osteoporosis or fractures, body mass index, years since menopause, smoking status, and number of falls in the past year were significantly (P < 0.05) related to the validity of self-report. The validity of self-reports for fracture varies by fracture sites and many other factors. The assessed validity in this study is likely conservative because some of the unconfirmed self-reports may be due to poor medical record systems. The validity of self-reports for hip and forearm/wrist fractures is high in this study, supporting their use in epidemiological studies among postmenopausal women.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of Self-Report of Fractures: Results from a Prospective Study in Men and Women Across EuropeOsteoporosis International, 2000
- Validity of Self-Reports of Fractures in Perimenopausal WomenAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Design of the Women’s Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational StudyControlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Remembering fractures: fracture registration and proband recall in southern Sweden.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- Earlier wrist fracture: A confounding factor in distal forearm bone screeningOsteoporosis International, 1992
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- The Accuracy of Self-report of Fractures in Elderly Women: Evidence from a Prospective StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Ascertainment of risk factors for osteoporosis: Comparison of interview data with medical record reviewJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- VALIDATION OF QUESTIONNAIRE INFORMATION ON RISK FACTORS AND DISEASE OUTCOMES IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF WOMENAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1986