In vitro testing to diagnose venom allergy and monitor immunotherapy: a placebo‐controlled, crossover trial
- 12 May 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Allergy
- Vol. 34 (5) , 792-800
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01949.x
Abstract
In people with a history of sting allergy, only prior reaction severity and older age are known to predict subsequent reaction risk. Furthermore, no diagnostic test other than a deliberate sting challenge has been found to identify people in whom venom immunotherapy (VIT) has been unsuccessful. We aimed to assess the utility of a number of in vitro tests to diagnose venom allergy and to monitor immunotherapy. During a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of Myrmecia pilosula ant VIT the following venom-specific tests were performed at enrolment, and at completion of treatment prior to a diagnostic sting challenge; leucocyte stimulation index (SI), IL-4 production, IgE RAST, histamine release test (HRT), leukotriene release test (LRT) and basophil activation test (BAT). Intradermal venom skin testing (VST) was also performed at trial entry. Only VST and HRT identified those at risk of sting anaphylaxis in the placebo group. Although IgE RAST, leucocyte SI and IL-4 production, LRT and BAT all correlated well with intradermal VSTs, they did not predict sting challenge outcome. After successful VIT, venom-induced leucocyte IL-4 production tended to fall, whereas IgE RAST increased and a natural decline in HRT reactivity was reversed. A confounding seasonal affect on laboratory results was suspected. The HRT warrants further assessment for diagnosis of venom allergy. Uninformative performance of the commercially available LRT and BAT tests may be due to pre-incubation with IL-3. None of the tests evaluated appear to be reliable markers of successful VIT.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- New insight into immunological mechanisms of venom immunotherapyCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- Insect sting allergy with negative venom skin test responsesJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- A simple device for deliberate Hymenoptera sting challengeJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1997
- The value of an in-hospital insect sting challenge as a criterion for application or omission of venom immunotherapyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Hymenoptera sting challenge of 348 patients: Relation to subsequent field stingsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Insect-sting challenge in 324 subjects with a previous anaphylactic reaction: Current criteria for insect-venom hypersensitivity do not predict the occurrence and the severity of anaphylaxisJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1994
- Comparison of two in vitro assays, RAST and CAP, when applied to the diagnosis of anaphylactic reactions to honeybee or yellow jacket venomsAllergy, 1993
- Predictive value of venom‐specific IgE, IgG and IgG subclass antibodies in patients on immunotherapy with honey bee venomAllergy, 1989
- Immunotherapy in Bee Sting HypersensitivityAllergy, 1979
- A Controlled Trial of Immunotherapy in Insect HypersensitivityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978