Size constancy and emmert's law of apparent sizes
- 1 December 1966
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 18 (3) , 266-270
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049536608255548
Abstract
Boring asserted that Emmert's law of the apparent size of after‐images held only under conditions of size constancy. In Phase I of the present experiment 28 male Ss made paired‐comparisons judgments of the afterimage size and of the distance of the projection field at 7 distances ranging from 18 to 126 in. In Phase II, 14 male Ss made similar size and distance estimates using direct‐images which subtended the same retinal angle as that subtended by the after‐image inducing stimulus. Although size constancy obtained, the paired‐comparisons scale for apparent afterimage size showed Emmert's law to fail as distance increased beyond 90 in.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Emmert’s law of apparent sizesThe Psychological Record, 1961
- What Is Emmert's Law?The American Journal of Psychology, 1951
- Concerning Emmert's LawThe American Journal of Psychology, 1951
- Emmert's Law and Euclid's OpticsThe American Journal of Psychology, 1950
- Boring's Interpretation of Emmert's LawThe American Journal of Psychology, 1950
- The Projection of After-Images and Emmert's LawThe Journal of General Psychology, 1948
- Size Constancy and Emmert's LawThe American Journal of Psychology, 1940
- Orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1938