Selection on male size, leg length and condition during mate search in a sexually highly dimorphic orb-weaving spider
- 24 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 142 (4) , 653-662
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1756-3
Abstract
Mate search plays a central role in hypotheses for the adaptive significance of extreme female-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in animals. Spiders (Araneae) are the only free-living terrestrial taxon where extreme SSD is common. The “gravity hypothesis” states that small body size in males is favoured during mate search in species where males have to climb to reach females, because body length is inversely proportional to achievable speed on vertical structures. However, locomotive performance of males may also depend on relative leg length. Here we examine selection on male body size and leg length during mate search in the highly dimorphic orb-weaving spider Argiope aurantia, using a multivariate approach to distinguish selection targeted at different components of size. Further, we investigate the scaling relationships between male size and energy reserves, and the differential loss of reserves. Adult males do not feed while roving, and a size-dependent differential energy storage capacity may thus affect male performance during mate search. Contrary to predictions, large body size was favoured in one of two populations, and this was due to selection for longer legs. Male size was not under selection in the second population, but we detected direct selection for longer third legs. Males lost energy reserves during mate search, but this was independent of male size and storage capacity scaled isometrically with size. Thus, mate search is unlikely to lead to selection for small male size, but the hypothesis that relatively longer legs in male spiders reflect a search-adapted morphology is supported.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual dimorphism and the differential mortality model: is behaviour related to survival?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003
- Female gigantism in a New Guinea population of the spider Nephila maculataOikos, 2002
- CLIMBING TO REACH FEMALES: ROMEO SHOULD BE SMALLEvolution, 2002
- Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercorariaJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2000
- Sex-specific selection and sexual size dimorphism in the waterstrider Aquarius remigisJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2000
- No association between sexual size dimorphism and life histories in spidersProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Multivariate morphometrics and sexual dimorphism in the orb-web spider Metellina segmentata (Clerck, 1757) (Araneae, Metidae)Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1995
- Time and energy constraints and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism ? to eat or to mate?Evolutionary Ecology, 1995
- Clutch Size in Spiders: Is More Better?Functional Ecology, 1994
- The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex.Systematic Zoology, 1974