A comparison of T-, B- and NK-cell reconstitution following conventional or nonmyeloablative conditioning and transplantation with bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from human leucocyte antigen identical sibling donors
Open Access
- 23 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 32 (1) , 65-72
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704084
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonmyeloablative conditioning allows for more rapid T-cell repertoire reconstitution following allogeneic matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation compared to myeloablative approachesTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2001
- Administration of interleukin-7 after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation improves immune reconstitution without aggravating graft-versus-host diseaseBlood, 2001
- Lymphocyte reconstitution following non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation follows two patterns depending on age and donor/recipient chimerismBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Immune reconstitution following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in recipients conditioned by low intensity vs myeloablative regimenBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Immune reconstitution after allogeneic marrow transplantation compared with blood stem cell transplantationBlood, 2001
- Melphalan and purine analog–containing preparative regimens: reduced-intensity conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic progenitor cell transplantationBlood, 2001
- Assessment of thymic output in adults after haematopoietic stemcell transplantation and prediction of T-cell reconstitutionThe Lancet, 2000
- Immune reconstitution following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantsBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Infectious morbidity in long-term survivors of allogeneic marrow transplantation is associated with low CD4 T cell countsAmerican Journal of Hematology, 1997
- HLA‐DR typing by PCR amplification with sequence‐specific primers (PCR‐SSP) in 2 hours: An alternative to serological DR typing in clinical practice including donor‐recipient matching in cadaveric transplantationTissue Antigens, 1992