Effect of assumptions on accuracy of analytical results and liming recommendations when testing a volume or weight of soil
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
- Vol. 20 (1-2) , 121-137
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628909368073
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Improved Woodruff Buffer for Estimation of Lime RequirementsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1984
- Reliability of volumetric sampling as compared to weighed samples in quantitative soil test interpretationsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1983
- Lime Requirement Methods for Cold-Region Soils1Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- An Improved SMP Soil Lime Requirement Method Incorporating Double-Buffer and Quick-Test FeaturesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1978
- Buffer pH acidity in relation to nature of soil acidity and expression of lime requirementCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1976
- Uniformity of soil test results as influenced by volume weightCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1973
- Uniformity of expressing soil test results a case for calculating results on a volume basisCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1972
- Can we talk the same language in reporting soil tests and plant analysis? 1Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1971
- TESTING SOILS FOR LIME REQUIREMENT BY MEANS OF A BUFFERED SOLUTION AND THE GLASS ELECTRODESoil Science, 1948
- A RAPID METHOD OF DETERMINING EXCHANGEABLE HYDROGEN AND TOTAL EXCHANGEABLE BASES OF SOILSSoil Science, 1943