The Impact of Planned Care and a Diabetes Electronic Management System on Community-Based Diabetes Care
Open Access
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 25 (11) , 1952-1957
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.11.1952
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project sought to assess models of community-based diabetes care and use of a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS). Planned care is a redesigned model of chronic disease care that involves guideline implementation, support of self-management, and use of clinical information systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We studied adult diabetic patients attending three primary care practice sites in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We implemented planned care at all sites and DEMS in the practice of 16 primary care providers. We assessed quality of diabetes care using standard indicators for 200 patients randomly selected from each site at baseline and at 24 months of implementation. We used multivariable analyses to estimate the association between planned care and DEMS and each quality indicator. RESULTS—Planned care was associated with improvements in measurement of HbA1c (odds ratio 7.0 [95% CI 4.2–11.6]), HDL cholesterol (5.6 [4.1–7.5]), and microalbuminuria (5.3 [3.5–8.0]), as well as the provision of tobacco advice (6.9 [4.7–10.1]), among other performance measures. DEMS use was associated with improvements in all indicators, including microalbuminuria (3.2 [1.9–5.2]), retinal examination (2.4 [1.5–3.9]), foot examinations (2.3 [1.2–4.4]), and self-management support (2.6 [1.7–3.8]). Although planned care was associated with improvements in metabolic control, we observed no additional metabolic benefit when providers used DEMS. CONCLUSIONS—Planned care was associated with improved performance and metabolic outcomes in primary care. DEMS use augmented the impact of planned care on performance outcomes but not on metabolic outcomes. Optimal identification of the best translation of evidence to diabetes practice will require longer follow-up or new care-delivery models.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): A Practical Tool to Measure Quality ImprovementHealth Services Research, 2002
- Information systems in diabetes: in search of the holy grail in the era of evidence-based diabetes careExperimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes, 2001
- Interventions to Improve the Management of Diabetes in Primary Care, Outpatient, and Community SettingsDiabetes Care, 2001
- Effect of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Care Program in a Free Medical ClinicAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2000
- DEMS — a second generation diabetes electronic management systemComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2000
- Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes careWestern Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Diabetes MellitusDisease Management and Health Outcomes, 1999
- Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials Commentary: Meta-analysis is a blunt and potentially misleading instrument for analysing models of service deliveryBMJ, 1998
- Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor CategoriesCirculation, 1998
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992