The Diagnosis of Oestrogen Escape and the Role of Secondary Orchiectomy in Prostatic Cancer
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 52 (6) , 535-538
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1980.tb03109.x
Abstract
The criteria for the diagnosis of progression of prostatic cancer after primary treatment by androgen suppression (oestrogen escape) were studied in 30 patients. Objective criteria are essential for this diagnosis and in this study the bone scan was the most useful criterion. Twenty-one of these patients had a secondary orchiectomy: one patient showed a partial objective response and 3 had a subjective response. It is concluded that an orchiectomy following failed primary oestrogen therapy is an ineffective procedure and therefore unjustifiable and that alternative treatments must continue to be evaluated.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconsideration of Orchiectomy in the Treatment of Advanced Prostatic CarcinomaSouthern Medical Journal, 1977
- The Clinical Spectrum of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1977
- The prognosis in carcinoma of the prostate, judged on the basis of clinical classification into stages and histological gradingInternational Urology and Nephrology, 1977
- A Possible Role of Sertoli Cells in Prostatic Cancer Refractory to Estrogen: A Preliminary ReportJournal of Urology, 1972
- Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Continuing Co-Operative StudyJournal of Urology, 1964
- ENDOCRINE CONTROL OF PROSTATIC CARCINOMAJAMA, 1950