High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: the ‘rule of halves’ still exists
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2081-2088
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200210000-00029
Abstract
To estimate risk factors for stroke, to examine how different categories of patients with increased blood pressure are associated with risk for first-ever stroke event, and to estimate the proportions of these categories in a geographically defined population in northern Sweden. The study was nested within the Västerbotten Intervention Program and the Northern Sweden MONICA cohorts. A population-based cross-sectional study and an incident case-control study were carried out. The incident case-control study comprised 129 cases of first-ever stroke diagnosed during 1985-96, with two randomly selected controls per case, chosen from the same geographically defined population. The cross-sectional study was based on 59,735 participants. Blood pressure status was categorized as: normotensive [systolic blood pressure (SBP) or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); untreated hypertension (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both); newly detected increased blood pressure (SBP > or = 140 mmHg or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or both). Risk for first-ever stroke. In the cross-sectional study, 68% of individuals were normotensive, 3% had treated and adequately controlled hypertension, 6% had treated but poorly controlled hypertension, 7% had untreated hypertension, and 16% had newly detected increased blood pressure. In univariate analysis of the case-control study, history of diabetes, daily smoking, obesity, increased blood pressure and the hypertension categories 'treated but poorly controlled' and 'untreated' were associated with an increased stroke risk. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only diabetes and the hypertension categories treated but poorly controlled and untreated remained significant, with odds ratios 6.1 (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 15.3) and 4.3 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 10.5), respectively. Only one of the 129 individuals who suffered stroke had treated and adequately controlled hypertension. The study illustrates the importance of adequate blood pressure control and, at the same time, that the vast majority in the population with increased blood pressure did not receive optimal care. Thus the 'rule of halves' still exists, and the high remaining risk in poorly treated hypertensive individuals in Sweden is remarkable and requires attention from the medical profession.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Widening Gap of Stroke Between East and WestStroke, 2000
- Contribution of trends in survival and coronar y-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populationsThe Lancet, 1999
- Shifting the distribution of risk: results of a community intervention in a Swedish programme for the prevention of cardiovascular diseaseJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999
- Hypertension awareness, treatment and control in the community: is the ‘rule of halves’ still valid?Journal of Human Hypertension, 1997
- Blood-pressure control in the hypertensive populationThe Lancet, 1997
- Case-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in north west EnglandBMJ, 1997
- Trends in the Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in the Adult US PopulationHypertension, 1995
- Control of blood pressure in Scotland: the rule of halves.BMJ, 1990
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological contextPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasPublished by Elsevier ,1990