SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF INTERRESPONSE TIMES: THE ROLES OF SHOCK INTENSITY AND SCHEDULING
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 44 (3) , 355-366
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1985.44-355
Abstract
Two experiments investigated the roles of shock intensity and scheduling in selective punishment of interresponse times. In each experiment the punishment contingencies were imposed on a background of rats' responding maintained by a variable-interval schedule of food presentation. In Experiment 1 all interresponse times greater than 8 seconds produced shock. In Experiment 2 all interresponse times greater than 8 seconds but less than 12 seconds produced shock. In each experiment shock intensity was initially 0.3 milliamperes (mA) and then was varied through an ascending sequence ranging from 0.1 mA to 0.4 mA, in 0.1-mA increments. Experiment 1 produced response-rate increases at low intensities (0.1 and 0.2 mA) but eliminated responding at the remaining intensities. Experiment 2 produced response-rate increases only with 0.1-mA shock, although responding was maintained at all shock parameters investigated. Analysis of the interresponse times per opportunity showed differential suppression of the targeted responses in all cases except the high-intensity shock phases of Experiment 1. The current data support and extend previous studies of selective interresponse-time-dependent shock schedules but suggest that response-rate increases are not a necessary outcome of this type of procedure. The view that variable-interval schedules of shock presentation selectively target long interresponse times was also supported.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTERRESPONSE‐TIME PUNISHMENT: A BASIS FOR SHOCK‐MAINTAINED BEHAVIORJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1984
- AN INTERRESPONSE‐TIME ANALYSIS OF RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY SCHEDULES OF RESPONSE‐PRODUCED ELECTRIC SHOCKJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1983
- EFFECTS OF RATIO CONTINGENCIES ON RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY SCHEDULES OF ELECTRIC-SHOCK PRESENTATION (RESPONSE-PRODUCED SHOCK)Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- RESPONDING UNDER SEQUENCE SCHEDULES OF ELECTRIC SHOCK PRESENTATIONJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF INTERRESPONSE TIMESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970
- A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- VARIABLE‐INTERVAL PUNISHMENT DURING VARIABLE‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966
- THE ROLE OF TEMPORAL DISCRIMINATIONS IN THE REINFORCEMENT OF SIDMAN AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT INTENSITY DURING VARIABLE‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENTJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1960