Radiotherapy and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Recursive Partitioning Analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 Phase III Randomized Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (16) , 2563-2569
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.5963
Abstract
Purpose: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Canada trial on temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) in glioblastoma (GBM) has demonstrated that the combination of TMZ and RT conferred a significant and meaningful survival advantage compared with RT alone. We evaluated in this trial whether the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) retains its overall prognostic value and what the benefit of the combined modality is in each RPA class. Patients and Methods: Five hundred seventy-three patients with newly diagnosed GBM were randomly assigned to standard postoperative RT or to the same RT with concomitant TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ. The primary end point was overall survival. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer RPA used accounts for age, WHO performance status, extent of surgery, and the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Results: Overall survival was statistically different among RPA classes III, IV, and V, with median survival times of 17, 15, and 10 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 32%, 19%, and 11%, respectively (P < .0001). Survival with combined TMZ/RT was higher in RPA class III, with 21 months median survival time and a 43% 2-year survival rate, versus 15 months and 20% for RT alone (P = .006). In RPA class IV, the survival advantage remained significant, with median survival times of 16 v 13 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 28% v 11%, respectively (P = .0001). In RPA class V, however, the survival advantage of RT/TMZ was of borderline significance (P = .054). Conclusion: RPA retains its prognostic significance overall as well as in patients receiving RT with or without TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM, particularly in classes III and IV.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary brain tumours in adultsThe Lancet, 2003
- Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic reviewRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2002
- Phase II study of topotecan plus cranial radiation for glioblastoma multiforme: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9513International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
- Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2002
- Implant volume as a prognostic variable in brachytherapy decision-making for malignant gliomas stratified by the rtog recursive partitioning analysisInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2001
- Phase II, two-arm RTOG trial (94-11) of bischloroethyl-nitrosourea plus accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (64.0 or 70.4 Gy) based on tumor volume (> 20 or ≤ 20 cm2, respectively) in the treatment of newly-diagnosed radiosurgery-ineligible glioblastoma multiforme patientsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Use of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis to validate the benefit of iodine-125 implants in the primary treatment of malignant gliomasInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1999
- Application of the MRC brain tumour prognostic index to patients with malignant glioma not managed in randomised control trialJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1998
- Validation and Predictive Power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Recursive Partitioning Analysis Classes for Malignant Glioma Patients: A Report Using RTOG 90-06☆International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- Supratentorial Malignant Gliomas: Risk Patterns and TherapyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993