Reconfigurations of penality
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theoretical Criminology
- Vol. 10 (3) , 337-360
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606065910
Abstract
Illustrating their arguments with empirical examples drawn from two recent research projects—one cross-European, the other Scottish—the authors argue that the new multi-layering of carceral forms in both prison and the community is one major, but under-explored, cause of continuing increases in women’s prison populations. Whether it is because sentencers believe the reintegration industry’s rhetoric about the effectiveness of in-prison programmes in ‘reintegrating’ ex-prisoners, or whether, conversely, it is because sentencers are reluctant to award transcarceral and over-demanding community sentences which set women up to fail, the result is the same—more women go to prison.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paramilitary Imprisonment in Northern IrelandResistance, Management, and ReleasePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Deadly SymbiosisPunishment & Society, 2001
- Punishment in DisguisePublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,2001
- Stacking the Deck by Piling Up Sanctions: Is Intermediate Punishment Destined to Fail?1The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 1994
- Intermediate punishment: Redistributing or extending social control?Crime, Law, and Social Change, 1993
- Comparing Intensive and Regular Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Early Results from an Experiment in CaliforniaCrime & Delinquency, 1990
- Reasoning and RehabilitationInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1988