The structure and contradictions of productive relations in socialist agrarian ‘reform’: A framework for analysis and the Chinese case
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 22 (1) , 104-126
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388508421971
Abstract
This article attempts to develop a complex analytical framework for analysing socialist agrarian reform, and to apply it to the case of post‐Mao China, perhaps the most sweeping agrarian ‘reform’ in the history of socialism. The purpose of doing so is to disaggregate the complex changes which have been wrought under the ‘responsibility systems’ in order to get a more nuanced sense of what has and has not changed, how the various parts fit together, and where the axes of contradiction posed by the ‘reform’ may lie. This analytical framework may also be of use in comparative analysis of socialist agriculture, though that enterprise is not attempted here. One basic argument of this study is that the ‘responsibility systems’ of the recent Chinese ‘reforms’ are neither socialist nor capitalist, but something distinctive, whose potentially heterogeneous elements must be identified, disaggregated, analysed one by one, and then reconstituted, in order to expose their nature, dynamics and contradictions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agriculture in China's Modern Economic DevelopmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983
- Agriculture looks for ‘shoes that fit’: The production responsibility system and its implicationsWorld Development, 1983
- A modified collective agriculture in rural growth-with-equity: Reconsidering the private, unimodal solutionWorld Development, 1983
- Consensual Politics in Rural Chinese CommunitiesModern China, 1979
- The Election of Production Team Cadres in Rural China: 1958–74The China Quarterly, 1978
- China's Cellular Economy: Some Economic Trends Since the Cultural RevolutionThe China Quarterly, 1972