More aggressive pharmacological treatment may improve clinical outcome in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated conservatively
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Coronary Artery Disease
- Vol. 18 (4) , 299-303
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0b013e32812cb91c
Abstract
Introduction Increased adherence to guideline-recommended therapies, especially early invasive strategy introduction may improve clinical outcome in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of more aggressive pharmacological treatment and application of current guidelines in everyday clinical practice in hospitals without on-site invasive facility, with a special focus on its influence on in-hospital mortality in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes patients. Methods We identified 807 non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes patients treated conservatively in the 29 hospitals participating in the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes from February to March 2005 and from December 2005 to January 2006. For all patients, pharmacotherapy index based on the use of pharmacological treatment regimen during hospital stay was assessed. Each patient received 1 point for each of the following guideline-recommended drugs used: aspirin, clopidogrel, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, low-molecular-weight heparin, β-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, statin – range of points from 0 to 7. Results The in-hospital mortality decreased with increase of pharmacotherapy index (0 points – 80.0%, 1 point – 36.4%, 2 points – 17.4%, 3 points – 7.6%, 4 points – 5.6%, 5 points – 1.7%, 6 points – 0.0%; P<0.0001, total mortality-5.3%). Independent predictors of in-hospital death were cardiogenic shock, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score, renal insufficiency and pharmacotherapy index. Conclusions Our findings support the need for more aggressive pharmacological treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes remaining in community hospitals for conservative treatment. Broader implementation of current guidelines and more frequent invasive treatment could improve the outcomes of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes patients.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment and one-year outcome of patients with renal dysfunction across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromesCanadian Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Summary ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Influence of Timing of Troponin Elevation on Clinical Outcomes and Use of Evidence-Based Therapies for Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary SyndromesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of CardiologyEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Care of non-ST-segment elevation patients: Insights from the crusade national quality improvement initiativeAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Impact of contemporary guideline compliance on risk stratification models for acute coronary syndromes in The Registry of Acute Coronary SyndromesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary articleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial RegistryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MIJAMA, 2000
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976