Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications
Open Access
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 16 (2) , 263-266
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi063
Abstract
Background: Bone scanning (BS), liver ultrasonography (LUS) and chest radiography (CXR) are commonly used in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer as part of baseline staging. However, in the absence of symptomatic disease, the usefulness of this routine diagnostic work-up is not evidence-based. Methods: We selected the study sample from 516 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer. For each diagnostic test (BS, LUS, CXR), we analyzed the prevalence defined as the number of patients with diagnosis of metastatic disease after an imaging technique divided by the total number of patients tested. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Initial suspicion was confirmed by other independent tests (bone X-ray, computerized tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) in order to identify ‘true’ positive diagnoses. Results: At baseline, BS was carried out in 412 patients, LUS in 412 patients and CXR in 428 patients. Thirty-three patients were correctly diagnosed by the initial staging investigations as having metastatic disease (true positive cases). BS detected skeletal metastases in 6.31% of patients, LUS detected liver metastases in 0.72% of patients and CXR detected lung metastases in 0.93% of patients. Before imaging tests, all patients with either LUS or CXR evidence of metastases were previously classified as having stage III disease. On the other hand, only 26.9% of bone metastases were detected in patients with stage III. Accordingly, the detection rate in stage III patients was 14%, 5.6% and 7.2%, respectively for BS, LUS and CXR. Conclusions: These findings indicate that a complete diagnostic work-up to detect metastases is unnecessary in the majority of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, whereas it may be indicated for specific patient categories such as those with stage III disease.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perioperative Screening for Metastatic Disease is not Indicated in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer and no Clinical Signs of Tumor SpreadBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2003
- Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging ManualSurgical Clinics of North America, 2003
- Frequency and distribution pattern of distant metastases in breast cancer patients at the time of primary presentationArchiv für Gynäkologie, 2002
- Staging of Breast Cancer: New Recommended Standard ProcedureBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2002
- Routine Chest Roentgenography Is Unnecessary in the Work-Up of Stage I and II Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Staging Investigations in Patients With Breast CancerArchives of Surgery, 1999
- American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 Update of Recommended Breast Cancer Surveillance GuidelinesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Stage III and localized stage IV breast cancer: Irradiation alone vs irradiation plus surgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1982