Maximum Perineal Stimulation. A Controlled Study
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 56 (6) , 644-646
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb06136.x
Abstract
Previous workers have debated the value of maximal perineal stimulation (MPS) in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women. In order to assess the efficacy of this simple technique a prospective study was undertaken on 107 consecutive incontinent women. They included those with stress, urge and mixed patterns of leakage. Patients were placed at random into treatment and control groups. All underwent clinical assessment, urodynamic study and a single session of pelvic floor re-education with measurement of pelvic contraction and cystoscopy. Those in the treatment group were given MPS using monophasic square wave pulses while under anesthesia. Independent follow-up assessment was performed 6 and 12 wk after treatment. Of the 107 patients, 94 completed the trial. A total of 45 were treated and 49 acted as controls. Analysis of age, parity, duration and severity of incontinence showed that randomization had produced comparable results between the treated and the control groups. Of the treatment group (60%) and 66% of the control group had significant symptomatic improvement. Pelvic floor function was re-assessed, using a perineometer, and found to be more efficient, having increased equally in both groups. Both groups of women improved irrespective of the pattern of incontinence. This suggests that MPS does not contribute to the management and that a single physiotherapy session with skillful counseling can produce beneficial results in women with all types of urinary incontinence.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intermittent Electrical StimulationUrologia Internationalis, 1974
- Treatment of stress incontinence by maximum perineal electrical stimulation.BMJ, 1967