The Conflation of Productivity and Efficiency in Economics and Economic History
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 5 (1) , 55-67
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100002273
Abstract
The literature of comparative economics as well as economic history is replete with references to productivity differences as reflecting relative efficiency in production. In socialist economics, for example, the longevity of the relative-productivity/relative-efficiency theme is apparent from Abram Bergson's (1948) early survey where, commenting on a productivity debate that had already been going on for over twenty years, he identified “the only issue outstanding” as the question “which is more efficient, socialism or capitalism?” The issue has continued to be addressed vigorously since then, and it is still outstanding. Again, in European economic history, John Nye (1987) recently pointed out that relative efficiency as reflected in relative productivity has been part and parcel of the postwar debate on French industrialization: the view that less productive and, therefore, “inefficient” family firms led to French “backwardness” in production.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Explaining the relative efficiency of slave agriculture in the antebellum South”Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2012
- Firm Size and Economic Backwardness: A New Look at the French Industrialization DebateThe Journal of Economic History, 1987
- Productivity and the Social System-The USSR and the WestPublished by Harvard University Press ,1978
- Slavery: The Progressive Institution?The Journal of Economic History, 1974
- Comparison of Economic SystemsPublished by University of California Press ,1971
- Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityThe Economic Journal, 1939