Disclosure and Informed-Consent: Does it Matter How We Tell it?
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Education Monographs
- Vol. 5 (3) , 198-214
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817700500302
Abstract
Traditionally, informed consent has been handled by the physician in a one-to-one interchange with the patient. As standards for adequate disclosure become more rigid and demands on physician time increase, however, the physician-patient model may cease to be practical. This study evaluated four alternative disclosure models: a formal discussion, a videotape, a pamphlet, and an informal discussion, each designed and executed by a team of health educators. Study results suggest that the informed consent process is little affected by disclosure medium and that it may be possible to strive for cost-efficiency in disclosure without compromising the quality of the consent obtained. Based on these results, a two-part disclosure process is proposed which allocates certain aspects of the disclosure to the treating physician, others to health education.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- From the Editor-in-ChiefPostgraduate Medicine, 1973
- Restructuring Informed Consent: Legal Therapy for the Doctor-Patient RelationshipThe Yale Law Journal, 1970
- Multiple Comparisons Using Rank SumsTechnometrics, 1964