Abstract
The study of development and comparisons of the adult structures of the several groups of protochordate animals reveals something of their interrelationships and origin. The hemichordates are perhaps closer to the echinoderms than to the chordates, but these groups appear to have been derived from a bilaterally symmetrical dipleurula ancestor, not from a sessile pterobranch‐like form. The origin of the chordates is speculative but the idea of a prototunicate stage is rejected. The tunicate is viewed as a highly modified end product, with fewer similarities to the ancestral form than amphioxus. Amphioxus is quite suggestive of the vertebrate, yet it is more like the tunicate in the details of its embryology and along with that rather extreme peripheral group is best thought of as constituting a subphylum, the Acraniata.The idea of the early vertebrate as a filter feeder must be rejected since it is assumed here that perfection of that function led to a sessile or inactive way of life (as in the acraniates or lamprey larva) and failed to lead to the active creature with highly developed sensory, neural, and locomotor systems identified here as the protovertebrate. Further, the muscular plastic pharynx and moveable mouth of the protovertebrate suggest feeding on larger organisms, predation, and the abandonment of ciliary water‐current feeding.

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: