Counterexamples in unbalanced two-way analysis of variance
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 9 (2) , 231-241
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827873
Abstract
Recommended methods for analyzing unbalanced two-way data may be classified into two major categories:the parametric interpretation approach and the model comparison approach. Each approach has its advantages and its drawbacks. The main drawback of the parametric interpretation approach is non-orthogonality.For the model comparison approach the main drawback is the dependence of the hypothesis tested on the cell sizes. In this paper we provide examples to illustrate these drawbacks.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods of Analysis of Linear Models with Unbalanced DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- The Analysis of Linear Models with Unbalanced DataPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Nonorthogonal two-way analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Comment on "Some problems in the nonorthogonal analysis of variance."Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Analysis of nonorthogonal fixed-effects designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models (Eisenhart Model I)The American Statistician, 1974
- Some problems in the nonorthogonal analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Exact methods in the unbalanced, two-way analysis of variance - a geometric viewCommunications in Statistics, 1974
- The Analysis of Multiple Classifications with Unequal Numbers in the Different ClassesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1934