Are we providing adequate postnatal services?
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 23 (2) , 210-212
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01239.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early discharge after childbirth: too late for a randomised trial?The Medical Journal of Australia, 1998
- A comparison of the incidence of breast feeding two and four months after delivery in mothers discharged within 72 hours and after 72 hours post deliveryMidwifery, 1998
- The safety of early postpartum discharge: A review and critiqueObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- The Politics of “Drive‐Through Deliveries”: Putting Early Postpartum Discharge on the Legislative AgendaThe Milbank Quarterly, 1997
- Early Discharge of Newborns and Mothers: A Critical Review of the LiteraturePublished by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,1995
- A cost analysis of early discharge and domiciliary visits versus standard hospital care for low‐risk obstetric clientsAustralian Journal of Public Health, 1994
- To stay or not to stay: are fears about shorter postnatal hospital stays justified?Midwifery, 1992
- A Randomized, Controlled Evaluation of Early Postpartum Hospital DischargeBirth, 1990
- Early Discharge with Home Follow‐up: Impacts on Low‐Income Mothers and InfantsJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1989