New Guidelines for Coding Physicians' Services — A Step Backward
- 3 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 339 (23) , 1705-1708
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199812033392312
Abstract
In July 1998, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) intended to implement a revised and more complex set of guidelines specifying how physicians should code and document “evaluation and management” services billed to Medicare. These services include office visits and hospital visits and are distinguished from surgery and other invasive procedures. In 1996, Medicare payments for evaluation and management services totaled about $16 billion, or 40 percent of payments to physicians under the program.1 Before the proposed date of implementation, the new guidelines created considerable turmoil among practicing physicians and were a subject of spirited and sometimes angry commentary in . . .Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation and Management Guidelines — Fatally FlawedNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- E&M GuidelinesChest, 1998
- CPT Coding and Medicare ReimbursementChest, 1998
- Understanding the Fraud and Abuse Laws: Guidance for InternistsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Predicting the Work of Evaluation and Management ServicesMedical Care, 1992
- Understanding the Medicare Fee Schedule and its Impact on Physicians Under the Final RuleMedical Care, 1992
- Resource-based relative values. An overviewPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Evaluation and management services in the Resource-Based Relative Value ScalePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Cross-specialty linkage of resource-based relative value scales. Linking specialties by services and procedures of equal workPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Clinical Problem Solving: A Behavioral AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978