Role of Nitric Oxide in the Coronary Microvascular Responses to Adenosine and Increased Metabolic Demand
- 15 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 91 (6) , 1807-1813
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1807
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) participates in coronary microvascular responses to adenosine and pacing-induced increases in metabolic demand by maintaining an optimal distribution of coronary resistance. Methods and Results Coronary microvascular diameters were measured by stroboscopic epi-illumination and intravital microscopy in open-chest dogs (n=20). Epicardial coronary blood velocity (CBV) was measured by Doppler flowmetry. Responses to adenosine (1 and 10 μg · kg−1 · min−1 IC) and left atrial pacing (180 beats per minute) were recorded before and after inhibition of NO synthesis by NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 30 μg · kg−1 · min−1 IC). At baseline, adenosine dilated arterioles (P<.05) more than small arteries (>100 μm) (−4±6% and 7±3%, P<.05 for the higher dose) and increased CBV (43±31% and 118±25%, P<.05). Left atrial pacing dilated arterioles (12±2%, P<.05) and small arteries (8±3%, P<.05) and also increased CBV (68±9%, P<.05). L-NAME abolished CBV increases caused by acetylcholine (10 and 100 ng · kg−1 · min−1 IC; 53±33% and 168±82% versus −12±15% and −1±14%, P<.05) but not papaverine. Small arteries were constricted by L-NAME (−8±2%, P<.05), arterioles were dilated (10±4%, P<.05), and CBV was unchanged. After L-NAME, adenosine failed to dilate arterioles further (3±3% and 2±2%; P<.05 versus prior responses), and CBV changes were attenuated (14±16% and 8±13%; P<.05 versus prior responses). Pacing also failed to dilate arterioles (−4±2%, P<.05 versus prior response), resulting in an attenuated CBV change (34±13%, P<.05 versus prior response). The possibility that adenosine stimulates NO release in canine coronary arterioles was investigated in isolated arterioles (diameters, 81±4 μm; n=8). Adenosine caused dose-dependent dilation to maximal diameter, which was unaffected by inhibition of NO synthesis by L-NAME. Conclusions Inhibition of NO synthesis attenuates coronary dilation during adenosine infusions and during pacing-induced increases in metabolic demand. Inhibition of NO synthesis may shift the major site of coronary resistance into small arteries through autoregulatory adjustments in arterioles. These data therefore suggest that NO, by dilating predominantly small coronary arteries, promotes metabolic coronary dilation by preserving the tone and vasodilator reserve of arterioles.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of nitric oxide synthesis in the regulation of coronary vascular tone in the isolated perfused rabbit heartCardiovascular Research, 1992
- Vasomotor properties of porcine endocardial and epicardial microvesselsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1992
- Functional distribution of alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the coronary microcirculation.Circulation, 1991
- Effects of inhibition of nitric oxide formation on basal vasomotion and endothelium-dependent responses of the coronary arteries in awake dogs.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1991
- Endothelium-dependent, flow-induced dilation of isolated coronary arteriolesAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1990
- Endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) and resistance vessels in an intact vascular bed: a microangiographic study of the rabbit isolated earBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1988
- Microvascular distribution of coronary vascular resistance in beating left ventricleAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 1986
- Flow-Dependent, Endothelium-Mediated Dilation of Epicardial Coronary Arteries in Conscious DogsJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1984
- Coronary physiologyPhysiological Reviews, 1983
- Regulation of Coronary Blood FlowPhysiological Reviews, 1964