Chaos and Control: Nanotechnology and the Politics of Emergence
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Edinburgh University Press in Paragraph
- Vol. 29 (2) , 57-80
- https://doi.org/10.1353/prg.2006.0014
Abstract
This article looks at the strong links between Deleuze's molecular ontology and the fields of complexity and emergence, and argues that Deleuze's work implies a ‘philosophy of technology’ that is both open and dynamic. Following Simondon and von Uexküll, Deleuze suggests that technical objects are ontologically unstable, and are produced by processes of individuation and self-organization in complex relations with their environment. For Deleuze design is not imposed from without, but emerges from within matter. The fundamental departure for Deleuze, on the basis of such an ontology, is to conceive of modes of relating to the evolution of technology. In this way Deleuze, along with Guattari, provides the basis for an ethics and a politics of becoming and emergent control that constitutes an alternative to the hubris of contemporary reductionist accounts of new areas such as nanotechnology.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reflexing ComplexityTheory, Culture & Society, 2005
- The Complexity TurnTheory, Culture & Society, 2005
- Complexity and LifeTheory, Culture & Society, 2005
- Emulating biology: Building nanostructures from the bottom upProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- Toward complex matter: Supramolecular chemistry and self-organizationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002