Combined Staged Procedures for the Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by International Society of Endovascular Specialists in Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Vol. 13 (4) , 481-489
- https://doi.org/10.1583/05-1743mr.1
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the efficacy of a staged approach for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with open visceral revascularization followed by aortic endografting, in selected patients not considered candidates for conventional surgical repair. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 13 consecutive patients (8 women; mean age 64 years, range 33–77) who underwent visceral bypass followed by endovascular thoracoabdominal stent-graft implantation since 1999. Three patients presented with symptomatic aneurysms and 2 with rupture. Two patients had connective tissue disorders. All patients were deemed unfit for conventional thoracoabdominal repair due to comorbid conditions. The procedures were tailored to the pathology and specific patient anatomical situation: 5 aortic dissections with aneurysmal degeneration and 8 aneurysms (5 Crawford type II, 2 type III, and 1 type IV). Results: The patients underwent retrograde visceral bypass (11 iliovisceral and 2 infrarenal aortic to visceral artery) followed by endovascular aortic relining with Zenith TX2 devices (n=7), homemade endografts (n=5), or a Talent thoracic endograft (n=1). Six patients required either a proximal or distal direct aortic repair (2 infrarenal reconstructions, 3 arch elephant trunk grafts, and 1 ascending aortic repair), while 3 patients also underwent left carotid-subclavian bypass grafting. Two patients developed paraplegia (1 following a ruptured aneurysm), and 2 patients had transient paraparetic events. Two patients had acute renal failure requiring short-term dialysis. Three patients died within 30 days; 2 late aneurysm-related deaths were noted. Three patients developed endoleaks during follow-up. Mean lengths of stay were 13 days (7–30) for the visceral bypass and 12 (3–25) for the endovascular stent-graft. In addition, remaining procedures in 8 patients required a mean of 7 days (0–14) in hospital. Conclusion: Staged endovascular and open procedures are feasible for thoracoabdominal aneurysms in patients at prohibitive risk for open thoracoabdominal reconstruction. However, this approach still carries a significant risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity. The potential for less invasive alternatives should be investigated.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Zenith AAA endovascular graft: intermediate-term results of the US multicenter trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
- Primary Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal Aneurysms with Fenestrated Endovascular GraftingEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2004
- Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: review and update of current strategiesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair: Results With 337 Operations Performed Over a 15-Year IntervalAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Morbidity and mortality after extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- The Impact of Stent-graft Development on Outcomeof AAA Repair – a 7-Year ExperienceEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2001
- Mortality and paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a risk factor analysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operationsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1993