Consequentialist demographic norms and parenting rights
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Social Choice and Welfare
- Vol. 5 (2) , 127-145
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00735757
Abstract
This paper extends the author's recent work on dynamically consistent consequentialist social norms for an unrestricted domain of decision trees with risk to trees in which the population is a variable consequence — i.e., endogenous. Given a form of ethical liberalism and ethical irrelevance of distant ancestors, classical utilitarianism is implied (provided also that a weak continuity condition is met). The “repugnant conclusion” that having many poor people may be desirable can be avoided by denying that individuals' interests extend to the circumstances of their birth. But it is better avoided by recognizing that potential parents have legitimate interests concerning the sizes of their families.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consequentialist social norms for public decisionsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2011
- Consequentialism and the Independence AxiomPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- On Reconciling Arrow’s Theory of Social Choice with Harsanyi’s Fundamental UtilitarianismPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- More on Harsanyi's utilitarian cardinal welfare theoremSocial Choice and Welfare, 1985
- Social criteria for evaluating population changeJournal of Public Economics, 1984
- The Optimum Growth Rate for Population: CommentInternational Economic Review, 1976
- Changing Tastes and Coherent Dynamic ChoiceThe Review of Economic Studies, 1976
- A Synthesis of the Ramsey-Meade Problems when Population Change is EndogenousThe Review of Economic Studies, 1975
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityJournal of Political Economy, 1955
- An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable UtilityEconometrica, 1953