Prediction of Outcome in Depressive Illness by the Newcastle Diagnosis Scale
- 2 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 150 (1) , 43-48
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.1.43
Abstract
The Newcastle scores of a group of 64 and subsample of 52 severely depressed inpatients were not normally distributed. Evidence for discontinuity in these distributions was adduced from the contrast in outcome between the endogenous and neurotic patients thus defined, the endogenous consistently doing better than the neurotic group. The unipolar/bipolar system failed to predict different results for endogenous and neurotic patients unless unipolar was subdivided into endogenous and neurotic subgroups. The DSM-III criteria for major depression and melancholia failed to identify subgroups of differing prognoses.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- METHYLATION AND MOODThe Lancet, 1984
- Folic acid,S-adenosylmethionine and affective disorderPsychological Medicine, 1983
- The Choice of Diagnostic Criteria for Biological ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1982
- Have Multivariate Statistics Contributed to Classification?The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1981
- The classification of affective disorders: A synthesis of old and new conceptsComprehensive Psychiatry, 1981
- The WHO Depression Scale RELATIONSHIP TO THE NEWCASTLE SCALESActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1980
- A New Distinction between the Euphoric and the Anti-Depressant Effects of MethylamphetamineThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- Multivariate Statistical Methods and Problems of Classification in PsychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- The Two-Type Thesis of Depressive DisordersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1966
- The Independence of Neurotic Depression and Endogenous DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1963