Induction and the acquisition of English auxiliaries: the effects of differentially enriched input
- 17 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Child Language
- Vol. 16 (1) , 121-140
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900013477
Abstract
Children aged 2;0 to 2;6 participated in a longitudinal study examining their acquisition of the English auxiliary system following a six-week period in which they were exposed to additional auxiliary input in varying sentence contexts. Groups of children received enrichment utterances with the auxiliarycouldeither in first position in the sentence, in middle position, or in both positions. Children in the front position group were significantly advanced over the other experimental groups in acquiring modal auxiliaries but not non-modals. However, none of the experimental groups differed significantly from a baseline group which received no additionalcouldinput. The implications of these findings for understanding the mechanisms of auxiliary acquisition and the nature of children's grammatical categories are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- An analysis of YES/NO questions in input and their relationship with rate of auxiliary verb development in young childrenFirst Language, 1986
- Some contributions of mothers' speech to their children's syntactic growthJournal of Child Language, 1985
- Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances by young childrenFirst Language, 1984
- Initial verbs of yes-no questions: A different kind of general grammatical category.Developmental Psychology, 1983
- Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- How to Do Things by Asking: Form-Function Pairings in Mothers' Questions and Their Relation to Children's ResponsesChild Development, 1979
- Syntax Acquisition: Impact of Experimental Variation in Adult Verbal Interaction with the ChildChild Development, 1973
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Auxiliaries and the Criterion of SimplicityLanguage, 1967
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a ControlJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1955