Dependence of Response of a C3H Mammary Carcinoma to Fractionated Irradiation on Fractionation Number and Intertreatment Interval
- 1 December 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Radiation Research
- Vol. 72 (3) , 440-454
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3574609
Abstract
A C3H mouse mammary carcinoma (8-mm isotransplants growing in the leg, volume-doubling time of 2.5 days, median cell cycle time of 12 h) was used to investigate the relationships between total radiation dose required to achieve tumor control (TCD50) and: number of equal dose fractions (.nu.), time between fractions (ti), dose per fraction (Di) and total time of treatment (T). Radiation was administered under conditions of: acute local hypoxia produced by clamping; normal air breathing; respiration of 100% O2 at 30 psi. Assays were performed for: .nu. values of 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20, and ti values of 1, 2, 3 or 5 days. Radiation was given in 2 or 3 fractions per day with 4 h between treatments. Under hypoxic conditions and daily irradiations, TCD50 and .nu. could be related by a power law with an exponent of 0.27 over the range of .nu. from 1-10. With aerobic or hyperbaric O2 conditions, the relationships were more complex due to interaction between reoxygenation, repair and repopulation. Repair of radiation damage was demonstrated for acutely and chronically hypoxic tumor cells, although severely and chronically hypoxic cells appeared to be less capable of such repair. Reoxygenation was a major factor determining response to fractionated irradiation under normal conditions, occurring rapidly and extensively. In the assays using .nu. = 10, reoxygenation was as complete for radiations given 3 times/day as for treatment using t1 of 1-2 days. Respiration of O2 at 30 psi improved results of treatment for all fractionation schedules studied. Proliferation of surviving cells between treatments given under clamp conditions caused TCD50 to increase sharply with prolongation of total overall time of treatment beyond 9 days. A precise evaluation of the extent of tumor cell proliferation during the course of irradiation under aerobic or hyperbaric conditions was not possible because the relative roles of concurrent reoxygenation and redistribution could not be quantified.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response of mouse jejunum to multiffaction radiationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1975
- Hyperbaric Oxygen and Radiobiology of a C3H Mouse Mammary Carcinoma2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1967
- Normal Tissue Damage and Tumor Cure Probability for Irradiation Given Under Different Conditions of Tissue Oxygenation in Hybrid MiceRadiology, 1967