Patients’ Preferences in Randomized Clinical Trials
- 24 May 1984
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 310 (21) , 1385-1387
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198405243102111
Abstract
IN 1976 the National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast and Bowel Cancers (NSABP) launched a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare mastectomy with "lumpectomy," with and without radiation, in the treatment of breast cancer. Two years later, only a small fraction of the expected number of patients had been enlisted, and the trial was in jeopardy because of this low rate of accrual. What happened?In this issue of the Journal, Taylor and her colleagues present the results of a questionnaire study of why participating physicians entered so few of their eligible patients into the trial.1 They found a . . .Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Randomization Designs in Comparative Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Designs for Experiments — Parallel Comparisons of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The controlled clinical trial and the advance of reliable knowledge: an outsider looks in.BMJ, 1983
- Leaving Therapy to ChanceHastings Center Report, 1983
- Adding Insult to InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Ethics of the Randomized Clinical TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Ethics of randomised clinical trials.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1980
- Consent as a Barrier to ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979