Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 365 (9467) , 1348-1353
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61034-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got whatThe Lancet, 2002
- Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non‐inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- ?Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1995
- Small clinical trials: Are they all bad?Statistics in Medicine, 1995
- Can We Learn Anything from Small Trials?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Preventing IUCD‐related pelvic infection: the efficacy of prophylactic doxycycline at insertionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND ANTITHROMBOTIC PROPHYLAXIS: A PROSPECTIVE META-ANALYSISThe Lancet, 1989
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978