Participant Citizenship in Six Developing Countries
- 1 September 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 63 (4) , 1120-1141
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055400263235
Abstract
In this paper I will endeavor to do the following: (1) test how far certain concepts dealing with individual orientations to politics, previously used in studies of relatively advanced European societies, are appropriate to populations in developing countries; (2) ascertain how far these separate dimensions of individual political orientation cohere as a syndrome, indicating the existence of a general underlying dimension of “participant citizenship;” (3) identify elements among common orientations to politics which cannot be incorporated in this general syndrome; and (4) assess the importance of certain social experiences or forces in inculcating the qualities of participant citizenship in individuals exposed to these influences.These objectives will be better understood if they are seen in the context of the larger research program of which this report is a part, namely the Harvard Project on the Social and Cultural Aspects of Economic Development. The project is an investigation of the forms and sources of modernization in individuals. Its focus is on the person rather than the society or the institution, and its emphasis is socio-psychological rather than purely sociological or structural. Six countries are represented: Argentina and Chile, East Pakistan and India, Nigeria and Israel. This report will not, however, emphasize national differences, but rather treat each sample as another replication of the basic design. We assume that if something holds true for six such different countries, it must be a powerful connection indeed.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Modernization in Japan and TurkeyPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1964
- The Civic CulturePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1963
- Dimensions of Alienation Among Manual and Non-Manual WorkersAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- On The Meaning of AlienationAmerican Sociological Review, 1959