A Special Outpatient Clinic for Following Patients with Implanted Tachyarrhythmia Devices
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 10 (5) , 1168-1174
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb06137.x
Abstract
Implantable anti‐tachycardia devices have become an additional therapeutic option for those patients afflicted with life‐threatening tachyarrhythmias. Follow‐up of these complex devices are time‐consuming and, if mismanaged, may be dangerous to the patient. For these reasons, a special anti‐tachycardia device clinic was started at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center in July 1984. From the inception of the clinic to September 1985, 24 patients were followed. Seventy‐five percent had antitachycardia devices (ATDs) implanted for treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) with the remaining 25% for supraventricular tachycardias. All patients were seen every 3 months or more often if clinically required. Of 112 ciinic examinations, 102 (91%) were scheduled appointments (group I) while the remaining 10 visits (group II) were unscheduled and preceded by symptomatic episodes. The problems detected in clinic (groups I and II) ranged from sudden failure of an AICD to apprehension. Appropriate nonoperative treatment was given during clinic evaluation for 60% of the problems detected in group II, while the remaining 40% required eventual surgical intervention. Compliance throughout the 15‐month follow‐up period was 100%. Major benefits of the clinic cited by patients and their families were continuity of care, the time allotted to meet the individual needs, and management of most problems on an out‐patient basis.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Usefulness of an implantable antitachycardia pacemaker system for supraventricular or ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986