Iohexol versus iopamidol for cervical myelography: a randomised double blind study
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 58 (693) , 849-851
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-58-693-849
Abstract
A randomised double blind trial of iohexol and iopamidol in cervical myelography by both lumbar puncture and direct puncture techniques is reported in one hundred consecutive patients. All patients had EEG examination before and 6-8 h after the myelogram and for each a questionnaire regarding adverse reactions was completed at set intervals. The side effects, radiographic quality of the examination and production of sharp wave activity on EEG were equivalent in the iohexol and iopamidol series. Contrary to previous reports, we consider that iohexol and iopamidol are equally acceptable for all forms of myelography.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Iohexol compared to metrizamide in cervical and thoracic myelographyNeuroradiology, 1984
- Cervical myelography with iohexolThe British Journal of Radiology, 1984
- Guidelines for cervical myelography: lumbar versus cervical puncture techniqueThe British Journal of Radiology, 1984
- Cervical myelography using iohexol (Omnipaque), a new contrast mediumClinical Radiology, 1984
- Radiculography with non-ionic contrast medium: Routine bed rest is unnecessaryClinical Radiology, 1983
- Incidence of side effects following direct puncture cervical myelographyNeuroradiology, 1983
- Radiculography: Is routine bed rest really necessary?Clinical Radiology, 1983
- Transient Eeg Abnormalities following Lumbar Myelography with MetrizamideActa Radiologica. Diagnosis, 1973