The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 9 (2) , 63-84
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.63
Abstract
Social experiments have been used in research since the 1960s, yet the technique of controlled experimentation still arouses controversy among social scientists. The crucial element that distinguishes a controlled experiment from other forms of research is random assignment of treatment to the observational units of study. Because treatment differences in the sample occur as a result of random chance, the effects of the treatment on behavior can be measured with high reliability. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques and describes the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of CETA Programs on Earnings: A Review of the LiteratureThe Journal of Human Resources, 1987
- Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training ProgramsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1985
- Are Targeted Wage Subsidies Harmful? Evidence from a Wage Voucher ExperimentILR Review, 1985
- Does Free Care Improve Adults' Health?New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Econometric analysis of residential time-of-use electricity pricing experimentsJournal of Econometrics, 1980
- The Effect of Taxation on Labor Supply: Evaluating the Gary Negative Income Tax ExperimentJournal of Political Economy, 1978