Comparison of Source and Artifact Characterization Data Using a Generalized Distance Measure
- 1 July 1974
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 39 (3) , 473-477
- https://doi.org/10.2307/279439
Abstract
A major difficulty arises in sourcing studies when more than two or three elements are used in the comparison of artifacts with a number of potential sources. Multivariate statistical analysis can be used to define source groups and to allocate artifacts to their most likely sources. In this study of North Island, New Zealand, obsidian sources used in prehistory, the generalized distance measure of Mahalanobis and Rao is applied in three phases: first, to define source groups in terms of their inter- and intrasource variation using characterization data from X-ray fluorescence spectrography of five trace element constituents; second, the five-dimensional array was reduced to a three-dimensional figure for visual presentation; and finally, the highest probability of the association of an artifact data-set with that of a source group is used to allocate archaeologically derived material to its most likely source of raw material.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A paradigm for sourcing New Zealand archaeological obsidiansJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 1974
- First Millenium BC Transport of Obsidian from New Britain to the Solomon IslandsNature, 1972
- AN EVALUATION OF X‐RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR CORRELATING OBSIDIAN ARTIFACTS WITH SOURCE LOCATIONArchaeometry, 1971
- Discrimination of British Lower and Middle Palaeolithic handaxe groups using canonical variatesWorld Archaeology, 1970
- Trade and Culture Process in European PrehistoryCurrent Anthropology, 1969
- On the computation of Mahalanobis' generalized distance (D2)American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1969
- TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN MULTIVARIATE ANALYSISBiometrika, 1948