Who will leave? Oil, migration, and Scottish island youth
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Society & Natural Resources
- Vol. 5 (3) , 263-276
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380791
Abstract
Rural communities facing the prospect of rapid energy development consider trade‐offs between economic benefits and “way of life”; as disruption. One of ten‐cited but unproved benefit of development is increased retention of local youth, who otherwise tend to migrate away. Using survey data from high school students of Scotland's Shetland and Orkney Islands (affected by North Sea oil development), we explore relations between intentions to migrate and individual background, aspirations, and attitudes. Attitudes toward oil development do not predict migration intentions. Instead, migration intentions are predicted by essentially the same variables identified in other studies, in areas where energy development was not occurring. Thus, we found no evidence that oil development fundamentally changed young people's thoughts about leaving.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boomtowns and Offshore Energy Impact AssessmentSociological Perspectives, 1986
- Boomtown's Youth: The Differential Impacts of Rapid Community Growth on Adolescents and AdultsAmerican Sociological Review, 1984
- Temporal Shifts in the Determinants of Young and Elderly Migration in Nonmetropolitan AreasSocial Forces, 1981
- Does Living Near a Coal Mine Change Your Attitude to the Environment?: A Case Study of the Hunter ValleyJournal of Sociology, 1980
- Facets of redistribution: research challenges and opportunitiesDemography, 1976
- Some Theoretical Guidelines toward a Sociology of MigrationPublished by JSTOR ,1970
- A theory of migrationDemography, 1966