Decision-makers′ use of pharmacoeconomics: what does the research tell us?
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Vol. 1 (2) , 133-144
- https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.1.2.133
Abstract
Governments, organizations and industry routinely make decisions regarding the value of pharmaceuticals. The perspectives, techniques, decision constraints and available information differ across these decision-makers and sometimes within categories. Although pharmacoeconomics is consistent with the international trend toward evidence-based decisions in medicine and could benefit all of these decision-makers, the potential impact of these studies has been largely unrealized. Why is it that a field to which so much research funding has been devoted, has produced so little of clear use to major decision-makers? Would inflexible organizational barriers surrounding narrowly defined performance incentives and line item budget accountability limit the usefulness of even impeccably performed pharmacoeconomic studies? Or, are methodological and logistical considerations impeding the usefulness of pharmacoeconomics?Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Modelling for Assessing Health and Economic Outcomes of Drug TherapyValue in Health, 2000
- Using Economic Evaluations to Make Formulary Coverage DecisionsPharmacoEconomics, 2000
- Pharmacoeconomics and Clinical Practice GuidelinesPharmacoEconomics, 2000
- Financial Incentives And Drug Spending In Managed CareHealth Affairs, 1999
- The Revised Canadian Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of PharmaceuticalsPharmacoEconomics, 1999
- Industry Comment on the 1995 Revised Australian Pharmacoeconomic GuidelinesPharmacoEconomics, 1996
- The View From Managed Care PharmacyHealth Affairs, 1996
- Value Judgment in the Oregon Medicaid ExperimentMedical Care, 1994
- Basing Prescription Drug Payment on Economic Analysis: The Case of AustraliaHealth Affairs, 1992
- Source of funding and outcome of clinical trialsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1986