NASH EQUILIBRIUM AND BUYER RATIONING RULES: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 31 (4) , 631-646
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00895.x
Abstract
Laboratory experiments compare the results of two different buyer rationing rules on Bertrand‐Edgeworth duopoly markets. The two rationing rules, a value queue and a random queue, specify the ordering of buyers and generate different predictions under otherwise identical conditions. These experiments show market outcome can chane significantly with a change in the ordering of buyers. The direction of these changes agrees with the predictions of the stage‐game Nash equilibrium. Thus, the single‐shot Nash equilibrium is show to have predictive power even in repeated games.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bertrand-Edgeworth Competition in Experimental MarketsEconometrica, 1994
- Oligopoly Supergames: Some Empirical Evidence on Prices and MarginsJournal of Industrial Economics, 1987
- Rationing rules and Bertrand-Edgeworth equilibria in large marketsEconomics Letters, 1986
- Long-Run Competition in Capacity, Short-Run Competition in Price, and the Cournot ModelThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1986
- Price Setting Supergames with Capacity ConstraintsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1985
- A Comparison of Posted-Offer and Double-Auction Pricing InstitutionsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1984
- Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price InformationEconometrica, 1984
- Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot OutcomesThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1983
- Price Duopoly and Capacity ConstraintsInternational Economic Review, 1972