Effect of coactivation of tongue protrusor and retractor muscles on pharyngeal lumen and airflow in sleep apnea patients
Open Access
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 103 (5) , 1662-1668
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00620.2007
Abstract
The present study evaluated the effect of coactivation of tongue protrusors and retractors on pharyngeal patency in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The effect of genioglossus (GG), hyoglossus (HG), and coactivation of both on nasal pressure (Pn):flow relationships was evaluated in a sleep study (SlS, n = 7) and during a propofol anesthesia study (AnS, n = 7). GG was stimulated with sublingual surface electrodes in SlS and with intramuscular electrodes in AnS, while HG was stimulated with surface electrodes in both groups. In the AnS, the cross-sectional area (CSA):Pn relationships was measured with a pharyngoscope to estimate velopharyngeal compliance . In the SlS, surface stimulation of GG had no effect on the critical pressure (Pcrit), HG increased Pcrit from 2.8 ± 1.7 to 3.7 ± 1.6 cmH2O, but coactivation lowered Pcrit to 0.2 ± 1.9 cmH2O (P < 0.01 for both). In the AnS, intramuscular stimulation of GG lowered Pcrit from 2.6 ± 1.3 to 1.0 ± 2.8 cmH2O, HG increased Pcrit to 6.2 ± 2.5 cmH2O (P < 0.01), and coactivation had a similar effect to that of GG (Pcrit = 1.2 ± 2.4 cmH2O, P < 0.05). None of the interventions affected significantly velopharyngeal compliance. We conclude that the beneficial effect of coactivation depends on the pattern of GG fiber recruitment: although surface stimulation of GG failed to protrude the tongue, it prevented the occlusive effect of the retractor, thereby improving pharyngeal patency during coactivation. Stimulation of deeper GG fibers with intramuscular electrodes enlarged the pharynx, and coactivation had no additive effect.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The burden of pulmonary hypertensionEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2007
- Effects of selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation on canine upper airway mechanicsJournal of Applied Physiology, 2005
- Comparison of upper airway collapse during general anaesthesia and sleepThe Lancet, 2002
- Effect of co‐activation of tongue protrudor and retractor muscles on tongue movements and pharyngeal airflow mechanics in the ratThe Journal of Physiology, 1999
- Co‐activation of tongue protrudor and retractor muscles during chemoreceptor stimulation in the ratThe Journal of Physiology, 1998
- Direct Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Obstructive Sleep ApneaJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1997
- Dependency of upper airway patency on head position: The effect of muscle contractionRespiration Physiology, 1995
- The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Obstructive Sleep Apnea SyndromeChest, 1995
- Effect of upper airway muscle contraction on supraglottic resistance and stabilityRespiration Physiology, 1993
- Factors Influencing Upper Airway ClosureChest, 1984