Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 40 (4) , 802-810
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20405
Abstract
Despite the adoption of “sickest first” liver transplantation, pretransplant death remains common, and many early deaths occur despite initially low Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. From 1997–2003, we studied 507 cirrhotic United States veterans referred for consideration of liver transplantation to identify additional predictors of early mortality. Most of the patients were male (98%) with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C and/or alcohol (88%). Data for 296 patients referred prior to February 27, 2002 (training group), were analyzed; findings were validated in 211 patients referred subsequently (validation group). In the training group, 61 patients (21%) died within 180 days without transplantation; their median initial MELD score was 21. MELD score, persistent ascites, and low serum sodium (< 135 meq/L) were independent predictors of early mortality. In patients with a MELD score of less than 21, only low serum sodium and persistent ascites were independent predictors of mortality; for MELD scores above 21, only MELD was independently predictive. Prognostic significance of persistent ascites and low serum sodium for low MELD score patients was confirmed in the validation group. Risk varied continuously with worsening hyponatremia. Modifying MELD, by including points for persistent ascites and low serum sodium, improved prediction of early pretransplant mortality in low MELD score patients. In conclusion, persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis with high mortality risk despite low MELD scores. Ascites, hyponatremia, and other findings indicative of hemodynamic decompensation merit further prospective study as prognostic indicators in patients awaiting liver transplantation, and should be considered in setting minimal listing criteria. Supplementary material for this article can be found on the Hepatology website (http://interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270–9139/suppmat/index.html). (Hepatology 2004;40:802-810).Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- 435 Does the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) predict post liver transplant graft survival?Hepatology, 2003
- Around the world with the model for end-stage liver diseaseLiver Transplantation, 2003
- A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2003
- MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European studyGut, 2003
- Is the change in MELD score a better indicator of mortality than baseline MELD score?Liver Transplantation, 2003
- 427 Impact of the MELD score on resource utilization following liver transplantationHepatology, 2003
- MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocationLiver Transplantation, 2001
- A Model to Predict Survival in Patients With End–Stage Liver DiseaseHepatology, 2001
- Pathophysiology of ascites and functional renal failure in cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 1988
- Prognostic value of spontaneous hyponatremia in cirrhosis with ascitesDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1976