Sociometric triads as multi‐variate systems†
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Vol. 5 (1) , 41-59
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1977.9989864
Abstract
Binary choices (choose v. not choose) among three persons may be viewed as variables and the possible choices in a triad as a 64 celled contingency table, amenable to analysis in terms of log linear effects. Fifteen non‐redundant effects occur, of which four appear consistently in a data bank of 384 sociograms. Consequently, it is claimed one may reproduce the triad frequencies in most sociograms by the effects implied by four propositions: (A) P is more likely to choose O when O chooses P, net of all other variables; (B) P is more likely to choose O when X chooses O. This association is particularly strong when imitation produces transitivity; (C) when X chooses O (O chooses X), P tends to choose both or neither; and (D) P tends to choose an X who favors P's choices. P tends to not choose an X who favors P's non‐choices.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transitivity in Structural Models of Small GroupsComparative Group Studies, 1971
- Structural equivalence of individuals in social networksThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971
- A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric DataAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1970
- Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations: Testing Two Graph Theoretical Models on 742 SociomatricesAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- Statistical Analysis of Pair Relationships: Symmetry, Subjective Consistency and ReciprocitySociometry, 1968
- Clustering and Structural Balance in GraphsHuman Relations, 1967