Congruence Versus Phylogenetic Accuracy: Revisiting the Incongruence Length Difference Test
Open Access
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Biology
- Vol. 53 (1) , 81-89
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490264752
Abstract
Phylogenies inferred from independent data partitions usually differ from one another in topology despite the fact that they are drawn from the same set of orgaKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noise and Incongruence: Interpreting Results of the Incongruence Length Difference TestMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2000
- Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic InferenceMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1999
- Hybrid Origins of Plant SpeciesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997
- Gene Trees in Species TreesSystematic Biology, 1997
- TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCECladistics, 1994
- Relative position of the cheirogaleidae in strepsirhine phylogeny: A comparison of morphological and molecular methods and resultsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1994
- A randomisation test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic treeNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1993
- DNA and morphology: Inference of plant phylogenyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1990
- Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoideaJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1989
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978