Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 19 (5) , 449-452
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.19.5.449
Abstract
Objective: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who are not transported to hospital after an emergency (999) call to the East Midlands Ambulance Service, the reason for non-transportation, and the priority assigned when the ambulance is dispatched. Methods: The first 500 consecutive non-transported patients from 1 March 2000 were identified from the ambulance service command and control data. Epidemiological and clinical data were then obtained from the patient report form completed by the attending ambulance crew and compared with the initial priority dispatch (AMPDS) code that determined the urgency of the ambulance response. Results: Data were obtained for 498 patients. Twenty six per cent of these calls were assigned an AMPDS delta code (the most urgent category) at the time the call was received. Falls accounted for 34% of all non-transported calls. This group of patients were predominantly elderly people (over 70 years old) and the majority (89%) were identified as less urgent (coded AMPDS alpha or bravo) at telephone triage. The mean time that an ambulance was committed to each non-transported call was 34 minutes. Conclusions: This study shows that falls in elderly people account for a significant proportion of non-transported 999 calls and are often assigned a low priority when the call is first received. There could be major gains if some of these patients could be triaged to an alternative response, both in terms of increasing the ability of the ambulance service to respond faster to clinically more urgent calls and improving the cost effectiveness of the health service. The AMPDS priority dispatch system has been shown to be sensitive but this study suggests that its specificity may be poor, resulting in rapid responses to relatively minor problems. More research is required to determine whether AMPDS prioritisation can reliably and safely identify 999 calls where an alternative to an emergency ambulance would be a more appropriate response.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Protocols Allowing Emergency Medical Technicians to Determine Need for Treatment and TransportAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Who calls 999 and why? A survey of the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1999
- Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?Emergency Medicine Journal, 1998
- Patients Who Refuse Transportation by Ambulance: A Case SeriesPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 1997
- Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services systemEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Outcome of patients who refused out-of-hospital medical assistanceThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Protocols vs. guidelines. Choosing a medical-dispatch program.1994
- The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1990
- Is the emergency ambulance service abused?BMJ, 1980