TheXMM-Newton/2dF survey - III. Comparison between optical and X-ray cluster detection methods
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 351 (3) , 989-996
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07841.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Merged Catalog of Clusters of Galaxies from Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey DataThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2003
- The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshiftz= 0.1The Astrophysical Journal, 2003
- TheROSAT‐ESO Flux‐limited X‐Ray (REFLEX) Galaxy Cluster Survey. IV. The X‐Ray Luminosity FunctionThe Astrophysical Journal, 2002
- The ROSAT-ESO flux limited X-ray (REFLEX) galaxy cluster survey. I. The construction of the cluster sampleAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2001
- X-ray clusters of galaxies as tracers of structure in the UniverseNature, 2001
- The apparent and intrinsic shape of the APM galaxy clustersMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2000
- SExtractor: Software for source extractionAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1996
- The relation between velocity dispersion and temperature in clusters - Limiting the velocity biasThe Astrophysical Journal, 1993
- A catalog of rich clusters of galaxiesThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 1989
- Large-Scale Structure in the Universe Indicated by Galaxy ClustersAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1988