A Comparison of User Accuracy, Techniques, and Learning Time of Various Systems for Self Blood Glucose Monitoring
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Diabetes Educator
- Vol. 16 (6) , 483-486
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014572179001600611
Abstract
Accuracy of results of self blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) has been shown to be technique and user dependent. Thirty patients, using four commercially available meters (Accu-Chek II, Glucometer II, Glucoscan 2000, and ExacTech), were studied to test the relative accuracy, technique error rates, and learning time for the four meters. No significant difference was found in user accuracy among the four meters. The mean number of technique errors was significantly smaller with the ExacTech system compared with the other three. No significant changes in user accuracy were seen after 1 week of practice with unfamiliar meters. The authors conclude that while all meters had approximately the same user accuracy, the ExacTech meter, which required the least user technique, had fewer user errors and required less time to learn to use.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Sources of Error in Self-Monitoring of Blood GlucoseDiabetes Care, 1988
- Method for Estimating Confidence Levels for Measurements by Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemsDiabetes Care, 1988
- Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood GlucoseDiabetes Care, 1987
- Home Monitors of Blood Glucose: Comparison of Precision and AccuracyDiabetes Care, 1987
- Consensus Statement on Self-Monitor ing of Blood GlucoseDiabetes Care, 1987
- Comparison of Various Methods for Rapid Glucose EstimationDiabetes Care, 1981