Vulvovaginal-Swab or First-Catch Urine Specimen To Detect Chlamydia trachomatis in Women in a Community Setting?
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 44 (12) , 4389-4394
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01060-06
Abstract
Screening for chlamydia in women is widely recommended. We evaluated the performance of two nucleic acid amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in self-collected vulvovaginal-swab and first-catch urine specimens from women in a community setting and a strategy for optimizing the sensitivity of an amplified enzyme immunoassay on vulvovaginal-swab specimens. We tested 2,745 paired vulvovaginal-swab and urine specimens by PCR (Roche Cobas) or strand displacement amplification (SDA; Becton Dickinson). There were 146 women infected with chlamydia. The assays detected 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.1 to 99.2%) of infected patients with vulvovaginal-swab specimens and 91.8% (86.1 to 95.7%) with urine specimens. We tested 2,749 vulvovaginal-swab specimens with both a nucleic acid amplification test and a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay with negative-gray-zone testing. The relative sensitivities obtained after retesting specimens in the negative gray zone were 74.3% (95% CI, 62.8 to 83.8%) with PCR and 58.3% (95% CI, 46.1 to 69.8%) with SDA. In community settings, both vulvovaginal-swab and first-catch urine specimens from women are suitable substrates for nucleic acid amplification tests, but enzyme immunoassays, even after negative-gray-zone testing, should not be used in screening programs.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatisSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Enhanced Enzyme Immunoassay with Negative-Gray-Zone Testing Compared to a Single Nucleic Acid Amplification Technique for Community-Based Chlamydial Screening of MenJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional studyBMJ, 2005
- The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and designSexually Transmitted Infections, 2004
- Limitations of screening tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic adolescent and young adult womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Evaluation of Dry and Wet Transported Intravaginal Swabs in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections in Female Soldiers by PCRJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Population‐Based Strategies for Outreach Screening of UrogenitalChlamydia trachomatisInfections: A Randomized, Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatisin male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimensJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1997
- The vaginal introitus: A novel site for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996