Interexaminer Reliability in Physical Examination of Pediatric Patients With Abdominal Pain
Open Access
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 159 (4) , 373-376
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.4.373
Abstract
Objective To test the interexaminer reliability of abdominal examinations performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians and surgeons in an emergency department. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study in which 3 different types of physicians (pediatric emergency department residents, pediatric emergency department attending physicians, and pediatric surgeons in training) independently examined a convenience sample of children (aged 3-19 years) with initial complaint of abdominal pain. The interexaminer reliability of 6 components of the abdominal examination (the presence or absence of abdominal distension, abdominal tenderness to percussion, abdominal tenderness to palpation, abdominal guarding, rebound tenderness, and bowel sounds) and the clinical diagnosis of peritonitis was tested. Results Sixty-eight patients were examined by pediatric emergency department residents and pediatric emergency department attending physicians. All 3 physician types examined 46 of these 68 patients. When comparing residents and attending physicians, the components of the abdominal examination showed less than moderate chance-adjusted agreement (κ range, −0.04 to 0.38). When comparing attending physicians and surgeons, the presence of rebound tenderness showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.54). The rest of the components demonstrated less than moderate chance-adjusted agreement (κ range, −0.04 to 0.34). Conclusions The components of the abdominal examination are poorly reliable between physician types. Only the “rebound tenderness” component of the abdominal examination shows moderate agreement between the pediatric emergency department attending physicians and the surgeon. No component of the abdominal examination appears to be consistently reliable. Interexaminer agreement must be considered when developing management strategies for acute abdomen. Interventions to improve reliability should be developed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesiaThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- The Aesthetics of Clinical Judgment: Exploring the Link between Diagnostic Elegance and Effective Resource UtilizationMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1999
- High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990