Experience with a cross-study endpoint review committee for AIDS clinical trials
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 12 (15) , 1983-1990
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199815000-00009
Abstract
To describe the methods and results of a standardized system for clinical endpoint determination for defining and reviewing endpoints in clinical trials for HIV-infected individuals. A system was developed utilizing standard definitions for the 24 diagnoses or clinical events that serve as trial endpoints and together define the combined endpoint 'progression of HIV disease. A common set of case report forms were used for all trials. Thus, an event of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), for example, for a subject co-enrolled in an antiretroviral trial and a PCP prophylaxis trial was only reported once. A central committee was established to define clinical events and review endpoints across all studies. Events were classified according to established criteria for confirmed, probable and possible levels of certainty. This report describes the methods used to ascertain and review endpoints, and summarized 2299 clinical events for 8097 subjects enrolled in one or more of nine clinical trials. Data on the diagnostic certainty of events and agreement between site clinicians and the endpoint committee are presented. Uniform classification of endpoints across AIDS clinical trials can be accomplished by multicenter, multitrial organizations with standardized definitions and review of endpoint documentation. Our experience suggests that nurse coordinators reviewing all submitted endpoints for every trial are warranted and the need for external review by a clinical events committee may depend on the type of trial conducted.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- DATA ANALYSIS ISSUES FOR PROTOCOLS WITH OVERLAPPING ENROLLMENTStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Delta: a randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing combinations of zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine with zidovudine alone in HIV-infected individualsThe Lancet, 1996
- Didanosine Compared with Continued Zidovudine Therapy for HIV-Infected Patients with 200 to 500 CD4 Cells/mm^3: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled TrialAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Considerations in choice of a clinical endpoint for AIDS clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infectionThe Lancet, 1994
- Zidovudine in Persons with Asymptomatic HIV Infection and CD4+ Cell Counts Greater than 400 per Cubic MillimeterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Bias despite masked assessment of clinical outcomes when an outcome is defined as one of several component eventsControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Zidovudine in Asymptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Variance estimation for epidemiologic effect estimates under misclassificationStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION OF DISEASE STATUS IN FOLLOW-UP STUDIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTING DISEASE CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1986